Saturday, April 30, 2011

My Wedding Welcome Messages

"Ethics Primer" - Karol Wojtyla. (Excerpt)



has never had to see the pope on live, but is often used to see it on TV, and often heard his voice on the radio. Six years ago, when he left, along with a friend from college, sitting on a bench at the city hall, soaking up the warm rays of the sun (significant: the first time in my life during the Easter holidays there was no sun in Poland; Hidden behind the clouds, seemed to hide from people also tomorrow - apparently, in Rome will be raining and cold, another very interesting thing: Have you noticed how many breeds around the dandelions? Grandma once said to me, that when such a multitude of them, it means that humanity is, or becomes very ill ... - is it not so?), then this, freshly after his death, which was wspominałyśmy man and to this day, which is also significant, he awakens in people, only two reactions: Most, if it sees, even on recordings from years ago, I immediately have tears in my eyes ... The effect of a brick. But there are also those which by its very name is confused, angry, thereby diverting, irritating ... Well. Lets thank them for the time being. For me, JPII, our beloved Karol Wojtyla, has always been, despite the differences in ideology, authority, always. Just as, say, Shlomo Carlebach and Oriana Fallaci, but in other areas ... Therefore, today and tomorrow, and every now and then, I'll try to embed the stronie cytaty z jego licznych prac teologiczno-filozoficznych. Na początek:


1.


"Elementarz Etyczny"


Z nauką o moralności mamy do czynienia jeśli badanie pochodzi od faktów życia moralnego w sposób tylko opisowy przy zastosowaniu metody doświadczalno – indukcyjnej. Etyka zajmuje się istniejącymi normami moralnymi, a zatem ustala co w danym środowisku uchodzi za dobre lub złe. Nie określa jednak co jest dobre, a co złe – the task of ethics, which is a normative science (standard = opinions about what is good and bad).
moral facts speak for people but not directly on the rules. Morality itself is life, and thus its creator is human. Ethics seeks to address first acts, because they are specific and individual. The function of conscience is to get to the actual reasons of good and evil in our actions - here the important role of spiritual director. In addition to changing the facts, there is a consistency of views on good and evil. For a man are the absolute values force because it is not human. In addition to the immutability of man also reveals some changes in the secondary. But this constancy, however, allows the identification of people and counted them to the same species. Religious Ethics = Christian ethics - stems from a reflection on being (especially a human, for which the back is a revelation.) rational truth of Revelation, are complemented by a supernatural truth acceptable to the mind only in the light of faith. Rules of conduct included in Revelation coincide with the rozumowymi although not always for some reason can come such as love of enemies. It should turn attention to mastering the ethics of Aristotle made by St. Thomas - the inclusion of the thoughts that arose independently of revelation.

On the Origin of the moral standards
Ethics is the science of normative standards and distinguish it from other sciences. There is talk of the supernatural and natural standards in ethics: Supernatural - come from God, and their source is a revelation and the Scripture - the commandments, counsel, indicated. St. Paul in Rom. says that the source of moral principles is a very intelligent human nature (by nature they do), requiring each person to perform those acts which constitute the contents of the Order of Divine Revelation. Thus, the earliest moral principles are known to the normal man from its very nature without revelation. Man those moral truths realizes just reason. In Revelation and find more - the supernatural. Still, these are the birthright and the supernatural revelation contained in and re-mobilize their human and granting the meeting.

source of knowledge is always nature and reason . Reason is in fact able to know the truth about moral good and related to the same facts. The truth of the good based on the understanding of human nature, of its objectives. Where the mind concludes that the possibility of nature begins to fail there, the action of grace .
Ethical standards are based on reality, which consists of the operator and the number of entities concerned. Reason in its function regularization introduces a presumption of conformity with reality - hence the assumption of realism in ethics. This realism turns into a kind of Christian ethics at supernatural realism - a reality recognized by reason enlightened by faith (possible adoption of Revelation). From Revelation we learn of the existence of the supernatural and the goods must be noted that these are real good it takes a man and is believed to be faithful to them as it shows that reason and faith.

Nature and excellence

word nature in Thomistic philosophy is the essence of of being. Reason meets primarily being. Each entity has its own essence, and it underpins all its specific properties. The mere existence is the subject of substantial existence and activities. The action updates the essence of existence - it is what it is possible
it becomes reality. This is what life is possible, is the nature of its purpose, because it corresponds to the nature and contributes to the activity of the entity. Being working and become more themselves, because in this to become more himself included the essential good of each being. Good is what causes desire, which triggers for action. Various goods are to his efforts and activities, which contribute to human progress. Only the perfected humanity of moral good, because it is the central act of human nature, whose main power and authority is the reason . He takes part in the process of becoming human. Reason establishing the rules of conduct that follows this procedure is to be against this or any other entity that contributes to its improvement, it is. A man can only improve in the whole world order. Reason has some understanding and regulating the order of the world tries to make the most precise set of man in it. This is done on what is a thorough understanding of all reality. Reason enlightened by faith is a supernatural discernment. God gives his light, sharing his knowledge with people. This helps to better define the rules of conduct. Grace is the basis for being and acting in a way appropriate to God Þ action is dependent on the assimilation of God's grace. This is what man is and what it should stand by their moral life becomes for Christians the full meaning in the light of faith.
importance duty

Human nature is a source of standards. Reason in fact defines the rules of conduct. That is why discernment grows duty. Describes her mind. Duty draws energy from the dynamics of being, the momentum for good, with a will. A moral obligation is combined with will, refers to it is its duty. The duties will be to man moral or may not be. Therefore, the duty of the links of effort, tension. line voltage leads between who I am, and who should be . Will is the power of this tension. This tension in a way zdwaja will. Tension also arises between who I am and who I am, who I can not be. Here, for the believer emerging problem of corruption of human nature. Theological doctrine of the (original sin) the best will come out against the background of that distinction four states of nature: Nature clean - this would be if God had not raised her to the supernatural. But God has not done so, because human nature is not in this state of any man. This elevation to the order of nature over-fit the nature of sanctifying grace. Mature fusion of grace and nature creates the fullness of humanity, the state of unspoilt nature from sin. Therefore, the perfect state of nature can rely on a great fusion of grace. Maturity of the anastomosis has to rely on the full order. A man carries a full order. Lower energies of nature are higher. The man has a soulfulness that is adequate reason and will not be on the defensive, but the rule and guide. The will is essential for morality. The original sin of man knocked from the state of perfect nature, and still it is precipitated. It is a state of fallen nature (status naturae lapsae). Intellect and will hardly recover the man power to allow real good, moral goodness which is the target nature. Experience, however, support the work of redemption of Jesus Christ. Since the fall of man in him did not last, but he felt the hidden impulses of grace through which the leads according to the nature of work of rebuilding. God's intentions. It is a condition of redemption (status naturae reperatae) in which the person has recovered, although the word grace inclination to sin nature can not be rectified. A man is in a state of fallen nature, and redeemed. The will and the desire for the good have not completely decomposed, because this will become obligations of each entity, which means that it is still a tension. The moral duty of man shows that will no longer be together, that's the nature of the ailment at the root of your health. Themselves would not be known if the moral good reason not caused this tension. So the nature may be a source of moral norms. Reason, which may be mistaken in identifying suitable for good will, and can also with the trigger and fairly recognize the truth about the good. Position of the Catholic doctrine of revelation strengthens the conviction of the Matura possibilities of intellect and will. The second man is a tension in the tension between nature and grace. Because nature is not entirely a bad grace, so do not go unfulfilled, but it instills in what is healthy and creative. The entire business is focused on the grace of healing and strengthening of nature, man wants to restore the fullness of life in harmony with nature healed. It is not geared to disturb nature. The more nature heals and matures, the more grace mined from the reserves of these energies, which, without grace, would not ever run. Grace is becoming more like a second nature (there is less tension and more intercourse and interaction). Unbelieving man brings his inner drama of duty, the tension between what is and what it should be.
still ringing in my ears a question that Ali Agca repeated at a meeting with the pope in a prison: I'm a great scorer, as I could not hit? Why do not you came? This simple question is what makes the depth of this memorable event i. .. sanctity of Karol Wojtyla.
law of nature

man often looks to its nature as a source of evil, evil propensities. So where is good? The reason may be, among others escape liability. Fleeing from the law of nature is an escape from personality. This means that a person would need to feel much more the creator himself. This escape is even more an escape from lawgiver, and nature itself is not a lawmaker. It allows you to only read the mind and the will of the Lawgiver. We find it (the thought and desire) in nature, in its normal tendency. The human mind does not live by itself and in itself, but still faces the objective reality, we must understand, read it. Man is the only element in nature and does not stand above it. In every man there is a tendency to social life. This tendency lies some fundamental right, the man listens. Always indicates the existence of the right the legislator, who always cares about community. The law is always the work of reason. Elementary act of creation is a concern for survival, reflected in the nature of things. Tendency leads towards order, governance and in good order all the good it is good, in which humanity, man has a share. This participation requires knowledge of the laws of nature. A man has thought rationally listen to the Creator. The merits of his preaching should be. Law of nature, man knows reason.
Humanism and the goal of human

opposition stems often with humanism. If ethics is to be humane, God can not be the goal of human life, this goal can only be a man. If God is the goal of man is man can not be a goal for myself. Well to say that God is the goal? Creating marked the beginning of beings. God is referring to the existence of entities not looking at them make up their perfection. Act provides for the creation of his will and she always strives for the goal, which is good. Thus, God is revealed through the by good, not perfect but it is his. Creation is good enough for him, if perfection manifested existence. There is a hierarchy of goods. Any entity created by the fact that it is and what is complete, in some measure the absolute perfection of Being - God. In order to best reveal who God is their Creator, each entity should be created just as much as possible themselves. God - the purpose of creatures does not detach them from each other and from their inherent excellence, but it more in the deposition. The same applies to humans. What is true perfection of man, which he perfected, has the purpose of God, is an indirect disclosure of His perfection, His fullness. Religious Ethics begins with the awareness of the desirability of living. Continuation depends on how to turn out this contact with the Being of existence (whether by way of blame or fear, or by way of charity). When the relation of man to God, formed on the principle of love for people to people, then everything in it is happening and develop by. regularity, that love brings. Man has the right to love. A man is most himself when update to its highest potential. Love is an update to the highest possibilities of man.
issues of truth and mercy
religious ethics is a subject of criticism because God sees the highest authority of the truth about good and evil - Judge, who may, however, forgive the evil (mercy). Under these conditions, it is claimed, life takes on the nature of the game, risk, bad case, serendipity, etc. A man ceases to rely on self-judgment and strength and trying to beat. This utterly misses the truth. However, the problem of the court in religious morality, a man is different. He is convinced that God knows and passes more human than he himself. Man of self-determination should be that the court's own conscience about good and evil. The Court of God agrees in principle with the court of conscience. Even if the court is mistaken conscience, God takes this game of error of conscience as the basis for appeal of
human deed unless a mistake was not culpable of human rights. The Court of God is not human but a court devalues \u200b\u200bthe one hand, it counts on the other, it sharpens and refines. No mercy, it does not consent to evil, tolerance of evil. It is associated with the wobbling from evil towards good. Where there is, evil effectively disappears. Where evil persists, there is no mercy. The good can be born out by other interests., Mercy of God is another good, which generates good spot evil. Mercy does not accept bad but it helps in the conversion. Mercy of God goes hand in hand with strict justice.
problem selflessness

Religious Ethics sometimes accused of selfishness ; that prevents selflessness in that it promises to reward good deeds, for evil threatens punishment. The question of guilt and punishment is the eternal topic of ethics. It is very strongly marked in the Gospel. Some may say that in the interest of man is the ultimate justice - but nobody will say that a person who receives them by the same mercenary. "Interest" is not negating the selflessness of man. Justice is something unselfish, is more than interests. In each of us lies dormant egoism, which pulls everything under the criterion of self-interest. Imports of goods into this category is incompatible with its nature Indeed it is good in itself (justice is good because it is justice.) Proper "interest" lies in the fact that the welfare of their own to ensure survival, action, selfless character, what it has in itself. Absolute good is identified with God, man's dynamism, brings out the depth of human potential. "Interesowne 'understanding of the truth of the reward and punishment is therefore not consistent with the Gospel. It shows the way to the prize by the love that is not the "self-interest." Love excludes self-interest, so it is more selfless than justice. Christianity is a religion of love.
correct interpretation of the science of happiness

are, however, the objective interests of human beings which do not interfere with selflessness, because the result from the tendency of being human. Something like that is the pursuit of happiness. It is something natural and necessary, it can not not want. The desire for happiness does not lie on top of the willing, and even more on top of the deeds of man. However, it is not difficult to discover them. Happiness is the goal of nature is not ethical, nor the subject of choice. The subject of choice is always some way to go. Happiness is not the way but the goal of the road. Ethics indicates an indirect path to happiness. Here, however, can pose the problem of self-interest: that the theme of happiness in ethics appropriate to send a moral good. However, in the Gospel we hear the order of excellence. There are different degrees of perfection (you will need - the Gospel tells, possible - doing the gospel.) Excellence is not a heteronomous - not a man stripped of what is and ought to be and ends up in the same essence. Perfection is humanistic, interior and human. Fortunately, referred to in the Gospels comes through excellence. Does not buy happiness but at the price of perfection to it matures, becoming more fully human
. Happiness is already present, according to Aristotle, including becoming. In the Gospel, a man matures, not only to their humanity but to God. Puberty happens to God by grace. These two aging go hand in hand. Mature to God at the same time it matures to full humanity. This excludes heteronomy. A man does not buy happiness za cenę moralności, on dojrzewa do szczęścia. Dojrzewa tylko człowiek i to tylko do osób. Etyka personalistyczna (ewangeliczna) głosi szczęście, do którego dojrzewa się przez wysiłek moralny.
 
Stosunek do przyjemności

Moment zadowolenia czy przyjemności, który dołącza się do czynów człowieka, należy potraktować jako nieważny, uboczny, gdy uznamy, że człowiek dąży do szczęścia przez doskonałość moralną . Dobro moralne przynosi głębokie satisfaction. We not simply rely on the pleasure and according to shape their behavior? This concept of happiness (as the sum of pleasure), but quite alluring is no sufficient reason to properly direct the actions of man. Pleasure, satisfaction ... it's a good subjective, which may lead to the happiness of man beyond good of his people or society. Ethics does not condemn the satisfaction, pleasure ... but shows the teacher of a good objective, ie more than not. Christian morality does not lead a man by finding the maximum pleasure and minimum pain in life. Man is able to gradually sensitize the difficult good (spiritual and supernatural). You can not expect that the pleasure or satisfaction at the same moral life will give the correct direction. This will direct the intellect and the human side objective good.
values \u200b\u200b

Ethics emerging around the issue of objective good. It is a practical science investigation, human activity but primarily on how to set the value of this action objective good. Man survives different values \u200b\u200bbut realizes his actions good (good its existence, perfection person ...). It is also a good world, good God (s acting revealed the perfection of the Creator). Christian ethics teaches man how can and should give a fair value of a good action. Man survives values \u200b\u200bdirectly. The moral life expires on experiencing value. They occur in the hierarchy. Higher man
more values \u200b\u200b(expresses the conviction that the more they bring it closer to the objective good.) Values more of a higher human cost. These values \u200b\u200bare spiritual values \u200b\u200b(they are better, more cost, bring in objective good). They represent a man, his excellence. Moral value of man is more than physical strength or beauty. If the claims about the superiority of spirit over matter, as it was then understood that the objective of human perfection is primarily a spiritual, its moral value? The result of such considerations can not be materialism. Spiritual values \u200b\u200bare higher because it is objectively related to the higher existence of a being more perfect than the matter. Spiritual values \u200b\u200boutweigh its nature matter. Spiritual energies themselves also in themselves to develop and refine. Knowledge is the perfection of reason and morality perfection will. Only beings endowed with reason, there is the problem of truth, moral good. In addition to the spirit of truth and moral good can not exist. What material in man and outside it, determines the different ways to learn the truth and the realization of moral good. But what else is "conditioned" and another "cause" or "produce." Spiritual values \u200b\u200bcan not be definitively source in the matter, but in the spirit that it generates, is the direct cause of being of their creation and existence of man.
True or we see only what we want to see ..?
What is asceticism?

Ethics has only rationale for this ordering (the hierarchy of the spiritual over the material.) Position is related to the primacy of moral values. They are human condition of self-belief in their specific human energies and capacities. although higher spiritual values, it is weaker than the material . What material feels more; what falls under the senses ... this is subjective, intangible force. Spiritual values \u200b\u200bof man does not win in such a way as to property. In conflict with matter often assume defeat. It is also a human disaster, because the spiritual values \u200b\u200bare at its perfection. Man must therefore defend ourselves against this disaster, and do everything in his power to prevail values \u200b\u200bthat the less experienced, to weaker values \u200b\u200bhave become more powerful, because they are objectively better, and must remove that lower their subjective strength. The need for a specific effort. It is asceticism. It is normal and necessary factor of the moral life of man. This is a solid commitment to work on themselves, the work of moral perfection. It does not cover only the commandments. Asceticism is not to escape from life but is expected to deliver its fullness. By her man will come with all the values \u200b\u200band live them in their truth. Asceticism has some scratches religious, it is associated with religion. Asceticism comes when a man sees in it a way to God. It serves also to all the values \u200b\u200bare arranged in proper relation to God. This brings glory to God and man with him more strongly fused (on the basis of good).
Lady of All Nations, Mary of Fatima
ideas and humility

ideology differs from ideowości. It means their team's view, or addressed to the will and feelings, and above all are the subject of knowledge, belonging to the sphere of thought. Idealism and determined mainly disposition, her loyalty to ideas, ideologies recognized as true. Because the ideology of the people live in deeds its ideological relationship to ethics can be no doubt. A compound that is an attitude: humility . The attitude of humility is not the same as virtue. Attitude keeps a man on her to cope, it resentment. He hides a lack of humility. Bezideowością is expressed, or escape to the shallow ideology, for it easy. Humble person knows in theory and practice to come to terms with the fact that it exceeds the idea. Keeps him alert, quest, quest. Humble person is not in their eyes humbled by the idea that it is great and he's smaller but will try to grow it. Therefore, an ideological person must be humble. You can not disable it with genuine morality. Ethics is based on the Gospel, which so often speaks of humility, because the ideology that preaches the Gospel in many places beyond human. In utilitarian humility seemed useless, hated, because it allegedly degrades man. Idealism is not the mere presence of ideology in the human brain, is expressed as if compression strength of will. This compression is oriented towards the implementation of ideas, ideals, which are contained not only in doctrine but in life in humans. That compression comes from love but she needs to resist the humility not to be resentymentowi.
Seeing God

Gospel According end to human life is the vision of God (1Kor13, 12, 1J2, 3). Included in the study of these passages a vision of God is the true revelation, and so is the object of faith. According to Aristotle, man's happiness should depend on such an act, in which reason would be the most perfect Being the object of cognition. Contemplation is the pinnacle of being rational. This view tends to something similar as revealed truth. The idea is to determine the fullness of man's spiritual life. Revelation goes to the limits of nature (contrary to Aristotle), the more dynamic of the human being presupposes supernatural forces (sanctifying grace). Since man is by the grace of God's participation in the life it represents is also on the participation of man in wen. Action of God. Directly serve the divine virtues (faith, hope, love) through which man has matured to union with God himself. In terms of the Gospel fullness of spiritual life is supernatural. Something to do with the life of God to the human soul passes through the graces and virtues of the supernatural and the shapes of human life in God's way. How does it happen? It is a mystery of faith. Supernatural elements operate in the lives of all people, even those who did not realize, or even deny. No one is denied access to grace. Redemption for all. The spiritual life going to appropriate for themselves fully. When life is permeated with grace, going then to a fully objective, which gives a union with God. In it, namely the unification of the human being reaches the bottom of reality. The man is strengthened in this by fully understanding and love. Authorized balance is achieved during in all. With his spiritual man attains perfection by a growing maturity of the truth. In the meeting with God, human being has come into effect in absolute truth (the whole truth at once.) In this light, can not stand any false and lacks the human being.
John Paul II the Great - the Blessed Virgin Mother was for him throughout his life since the age of 9 he lost his surrogate ...
cornerstone of social ethics

is often said that ethics, especially Christian ethics, which deals exclusively with personal life of man, and does not enter into the life social development. Therefore, it is often opposed to the ethic socialist, in turn, dealing with the social side of human life. Aristotle called the ethic of "politics" because of its social nature. Today, you can not take it literally. "Policy" of which Aristotle spoke, the public interest can be found in Christian sources such as the letter of Old and New Order's strongly accentuates all of the obligations of justice and love. These two virtues are by their very social beings, and the mature fruit of their implementation, morally, is the life of every society, such as state of the family. The tendency for social work lies in every person regardless of his wishes, lies a need to live with others and with himself. Otherwise, gazed and gazed on this view, eg Hume, Hobbes, or Rousaeau. They advocated the so-called. Individualism assumes that the body has no grounds of belonging to society, that social life is the result of the agreement. The unit is more important than society, and it in turn owes its existence to her wish. Thus, justice and love of virtue Þ society, not its raison d'etre, as the scope of individual freedom in this system does not allow for their existence. If a man by its very nature is focused only on her good it does not want the good of others, much less the good of society. To a man could carry out the social virtues, must find in themselves a natural need for a reference to another person. Christian ethics is not only defends the social virtues that are the priceless heritage of revelation, but the weapons of those virtues in man. A person is being open, but that does not mean independence from society. It is being free in the social life and was on the ground of its tendency to live social good use of his freedom.
not hold your children come to me ... Remember how his robe that covered his toddler during Mass?
justice and love
love is more perfect than justice. Moral teaching of Christ was based on love. In terms of love is placed all manifestations of heart, kindness, devotion and sacrifice, and is associated with justice rather cold sense, firmness and severity. We must realize that these two virtues are interrelated and interdependent. May the two have as their object the good and the person. The justice must be at least two people and the good should be shared equally, even when the part would take place between many people. Justice is needed so that individual members of a society divided between them in a manner appropriate to these obligations, they have to society. Love has the same social nature, but when it comes to good (in the justice shared between people) in the love of it without restrictions, without dividing it comes to the greatest good for the other person. The person is the party which he loves and the party which is loved. If you want the good for yourself, you can not call it love, but rather the desire of so very often happens, therefore, to prevent this love must be anastomosed to justice. Love is energy that is closer to the person you penetrate into the world to identify with her being. In love with anything, we charge no. Triggers what is best in man and noble (unlike utilitarianism). For each substance, you can always just want the good according to the measure of its capabilities, otherwise it may be that "better is the enemy of good." You can love by. some measure, but we must remember not to pay the second measure more than to himself. Love is opposed to capitalism, but tends towards a man's generosity. Love people feel much stronger than the love of society - this road leads through justice, and in general it fulfills an important role Þ fairly protects the reinforcement and the stotalizowaniem.
The fight

The fight is taken by any realistic ethics. The fight is mainly connected with the world of matter, with the field of material goods. They are our most desirable because they can not be possessed and used simultaneously by many different people and societies. It is different in the case of spiritual goods, because they in turn can be possessed by others, without prejudice to its being for example, if a man "struggling" with the knowledge or virtue, or "a God" is usually not fighting for it with other people as adversaries but with himself, with his own weakness. You can fight for the good in other people. Christianity sees the fight differently than materialism. The fight is becoming a necessity if the tangible assets are not only fundamental, but only such as combating victim of social class with class, which exploits (you need to ask ourselves whether it is a class struggle for justice?). Christian ethics has not been and will never be a class. Understands the struggles for justice (can you say that such a fight he was also Jesus Christ). It is inevitable wherever there is injustice and it is even necessary if you can not otherwise agree to the conflicting interests of a fair fight then. This struggle leads only one party, as the second leads the fight against unjust. In each fight the good mix and moral evil (eg, physical evil is destruction - in the field of life, culture, etc.). Here we are reminded of a specific commandment to love your enemies. In the light of Christian principles, be sure to not spend zażegnując fight for her justice, as well as the fact that fighting did not exceed the requirements of justice. Christian ethics tries to pull the power of individuals and societies to fight for a higher good. Tangible assets - what leads to fight and separated from it. Proper human community of interests linked to is the area of \u200b\u200bspiritual values.

independent ethics in light of the idea of \u200b\u200bjustice

Justice is the whole moral order, but love is its perfection. Social Virtues determine whether the relationship of God to man and man to God is the ratio of one zespołecznienia up. Zespołeczniona humanity with God, especially by the person of Jesus Christ - the Redeemer of man. Redemption is good the injustice of man towards God. God is just the man for what a man feels that, in view of God can be a fair or unfair. Independent ethics - rather the ideals and moral principles are the elements of Christian ethics is a minus, which refers to God, what is its religious character. Christian ethics includes a turn, all natural ethics (approved in the Decalogue and the Gospel). It is not based on Revelation, and is not related to religion of revelation, though it does not mean that there is no non-religious. Previously, they needed no revelation to determine the principles of natural morality. A man with reason proposes the existence of a First Cause, which owes its life and as being able to know the truth should express it in your inner and outer life. In doing so fulfill his obligation to justice. Ethics is devoid of independent justice, he believes that a person can be fair or unfair only to someone who exists.
I also recommend ARTICLE!

Friday, April 29, 2011

Nipple Piercing Woman

Hoacin not only living bird with claws on its wings

One of my "Pet Peeves" * is an often repeated claim that of all living birds have only hoacin Crested ( Opithocomus hoatzin ) claws on the wings. In the minds of people who repeat this claim, for some mysterious reason, a single bird of the Amazon still retains pleziomorfii archeopterygových of times. Already on it would be something strange: hoacinova Although the phylogenetic position is extremely problematic (nuts has proven to be both Sibleyho and Ahlquist, so and advanced molecular analysis with giant dies), but while no one disputes that it is a deeply vhnízděný taxon among modern birds ( Neornithes).
Hoacin crested - the sole owner of the claws on the wings of the living dinosaurs? Nope ... (Source: photos.travelblog.org)

In fact, the claws on the wings of birds actually very widespread and quite normal. And yes, here I mean really nails - horny sheaths on the finger tips of recent articles. Lots of birds, other than it has in the wings as well as other barbs, but whose origins are exotic and - unlike "real" nails, which are the real legacy of theropod dinosaurs - a structure derived, not primitive. These "spurs" (Spurs) wrote Darren Naish series of articles (here , here and here ) in connection with xenicibisem appeared on this blog. Most of the keratin-coated projections pastern bone or carpal bones (Rand 1954). Just two such spurs as the Caja-cheeked ( Chaun chavaria - kamišovití, Swans, Geese), on a large alulárním metakarpálu. List of taxa for which there are real claws, for example, offers Stettenheim (2000) and the blog I quoted him several times. I soon also found that, particularly in the older literature was relatively frequent occurrence of the clutches of the topic. The very first work (say, from the 1st half of the 19th century), although not distinguish between actual záprstními claws and spurs, he Jeffries (1881), but eliminate this and showed that the right claws are relatively widespread. Interestingly, due to the use of vernacular names was not easy to decipher later authors, in which the bird's claws actually Jeffries found. In his footsteps however, continued as PL Sclater (yes, the one which was named after cassowaries Sclaterův ), who reported the presence of claws havranovitého vulture (Coragyps [then Cathartes ] atratus) and also from tea ( Chaun ), which combines the excitement of the (primitive) with spurs, claws (Sclater 1886).
Wetmore (1920) further explored the 12 "groups" rorýsovitých (Apodidae, then "Micropodidae) and only one of them were missing claws - for Swiftlets (Collocalia ). Intrigued him is that Jeffries scored rorýsovitých claw at the Old World, while in Peru ostnitého Common Swift (Chaetura pelagic ) was missing. Wetmore did not confirm this observation, however, revealed quite an interesting fact - that the relatives klechovitých (Hemiprocnidae) has no representative wing claws. With a thorough analysis of the presence of claws came Heilmann (1926) in his famous book The Origin of Birds . It is indeed notorious that, fifty years after its Publication halted debate on the origins of birds, in many ways, it is nonetheless an admirable work. Heilmann was probably one of the first who remarked that the claws on the wings of birds are among the living completely normal thing. The young ducks, geese, hawk, Tern, Pied Avocet, ouhorlíků, godwit and claws lysek recorded as the first (alulárním, embryological II.) And the second (large, embryological III.) Fingers, but often only the first. Adult birds with claws on its fingers in its alulárním Policy Covers geese, ducks, swans, vultures, hawks, eagles and even some singers (Passeriformes). Occasional large claws on its fingers Heilmann (1926) also reported from all runners - ostrich, rhea, emu, and kiviho casuar.
most detailed analysis of the issue apparently carried out by Fisher (1940), from whose work I took over most of the above citations. Fisher based his analysis on a total of 2004 (!) Of bird skins and bodies loaded with alcohol, representing various ontogenetic stages 227 "groups". (As David said Marjanovic, who knows how many "families" would be made today - historically avian systematics clearly sought to "splitterství", ie fragmentation.) Claws on alulárním and / or large fingers scored a total of 51 "families" and 225 "species". Taxa claws possession, presented in tabular form, which also refers to the age of the specimens. The alulárním finger nails were normal for the red (Gaviiformes), storks (Ciconiiformes), anseriformes (Anseriformes), digging (Galliformes), predators ("Falconiformes", perhaps the Accipitriformes and Falconidae), "krátkokřídlých (" Gruiformes "- without a complete study of Fisher's hard to say which taxa that have been around ...), dlouhokřídlých (Charadriiformes) and owls (Strigiformes). Not always, of course, claw possess all investigated representatives of the group. Claw on the big toe was much rarer: the regular presence of Fisher (1940) recorded only for pups and anseriformes hoacina all ontogenetic stages, while at least occasionally appeared (in accordance with Heilmannovými data) as well as other forms. Nails were never found in grebes (Podicipedidae) měkkozobých (Columbiformes), Trogon (Trogonidae) srostloprstých (Coraciiformes), woodpeckers (Piciformes), klechovitých (Hemiprocnidae) or, finally, in any of 241 specimens of 68 "groups" of singers.
are also important conclusions to which Fisher arrived. Above all, the author clearly worded something studies suggest bird claws for decades: that their presence does not taxonomic significance. (This is of course a general rule, not the whole truth. Wetmore [1920] for example has argued that with the discovery of the claws of Common Swift ostnitého gone further argument for the allocation rorýsovitých "měkkoocasé [Apodinae] and ostnoocasé [Chaeturinae] - and he was right, so apparently fundamental dichotomy rorýsovitých actually looks.) Fisher, however, also dealt with other aspects of claws: showed that more and are better developed in juveniles than adults (although from this rule are likely to exceptions - Wetmore [1920] as the Common Swift scored his nails until the very late stage of ontogeny) and that may or may not be present even in different individuals of the same "kind".

Darren Naish the first of the above-mentioned series of articles about bird Kyje, spikes, thorns and claws divorced at the claws of birds which occasionally occur in large (embryological III.) Finger: In addition to the customary hoacina, Fisher mentioned anseriformes and Heilmann Revert mentioned as well as flamingos (Phoenicopteridae).
quite interesting is the story of Talon kasuářího: Stettenheim (2000) stated that these flightless birds are the big finger and a large curved claw, which is used as a weapon. D. Naish this fact commented on the fact that no other source did not mention this fact and then added that it is probably a confused reference to the Talon II. finger leg, which actually serves as a weapon. This seems quite unlikely (if one thinks about it, it's hard to imagine casuar to attack with its claws on the wing, compared to pop-up images of birds into the air feet first are well known ), so in the article where I have this Stettenheimovo repeated assertions, I implement corrective editing. On the other hand, the fact remains that kasuárově big toe claw is actually located. Illustrates the necessary illustrations Parker (1888), that I have a blog přetisknul once (and again can be seen below this paragraph). Claw on the wing are also the closest living relatives cassowaries, emuové, and again the finger III (Fisher, 1940; Scott, 1996). Emuům however, no other finger was left, so it would be elsewhere or not.
cassowaries claw on the big toe - though apparently not used as a weapon ( Contra Stettenheim 2000), probably more than well. This illustration comes from Parker's study, dealing by the presence of claws on the wings of runners (Parker 1888). (Source: wikimedia.org)

the Talon III. (And only) finger emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae ). The image is part of a series of photographs , more or less complete dissection of the bird's capture led by Matt Wedel, known to participate in the blog SV-POW. (Source: drvector.blogspot.com)

The nejironičtější fact, however, just beginning - the previously mentioned article by D. Naish one commentator pointed out that the nails must have noticed by anyone who has ever looked at a little more carefully on baked chicken wing. This was confirmed by Matt Taylor and the same fact was also mentioned several times the Dinosaur Mailing List . While most articles and books force us to look at the wing claws, exotic Amazonian endemic, it is in fact even the most common bird, what can not imagine with what we encounter almost every day - Gallus gallus f. domestica , or chicken.
have so far that should therefore be clear that the alulárním finger nails are not uncommon at all - on the contrary, it is a fairly common character that is (by D. Naish) only "now and then selectively lost. Claw on the big toe is much rarer in its phylogenetic distribution, but we can determine that this is again a sign of inherited vided Neornithes - usually because the Revert and young ducks, geese, or the representatives of two groups of modern birds nejbazálnějších ( Palaeognathae and Galloanserae , respectively). According to the spreader bar is a loss of wing claws characteristic especially for the so-called "higher land birds" (Higher landbirds). The composition of the wonders in some analysis (eg, Johansson et al. 2001) actually coincides nicely with the birds, whose claws Fisher noticed: they include several singers and their relative strengths, including leskovcovitých and relatives (Galbulae), woodpeckers and relatives (green), owls (Strigiformes), svišťounů (Apodiformes), Trogon (Trogonidae) srostloprstých (Coraciiformes), and perhaps even kukačkovitých (Cuculidae). Fisher's conclusions on the absence of wing claws in passerine birds Nonetheless, he was the revision when Baumel (1953) reported the presence of adult female křidélkách hispaniolské crows (Corvus leucognaphalus ). Claws are curved and relatively well developed, with a length of 3.2 mm to 6.2 mm and left on the right flank. This study was interesting in several respects. Although such D. Naish says that unlike mezozoických neptačích birds and theropods have wing claws of modern birds bone support, Baumel (1953) explicitly mentions "unguální falanx" (= last finger part forming the basis of bone claws), and even admits that the "cured" specimens were present just such a bony core, while the horn sheath absent. Of course can not exclude the erroneous interpretation of that department, although the question of what then was, if not the claw - certainly not on the spur, you grow up in other places. A recent study (Wiley 2006) in any event, citing evidence Baumelův without skepticism.

hoacin So if not the only bird that has talons for fingers, wings, can be at least one bird, which is something up? Stettenheim (2000) as a bird list of groups whose claws are present, in the same breath adds that the vast majority of birds is just not functional, rudimentary services. A well-known than it is that young hoacinů use their claws to climb trees and birds as adults is to lose. (A less known fact is that some hoacinům nails grow again in adulthood. Strahl [1988] found that of 24 adults surveyed between 1982 and 1985 possessed claws 8 subjects, so maybe it is not a rare phenomenon in any way. Hoacinové Even adults who claw have, it has But do not use: on that climbed the trees are too heavy.) Youth hoacinové neornity however not the only who their heritage theropod actively used. Stettenheimovo allegations of cassowaries is likely to be ignored (see above), but it still remains one other good candidate: turakové (Musophagidae). The young winger's claw used in exactly the same way as young hoacina (as mentioned here or here). There were also speculations some forusracidi had hypertrophied claws and use them for hunting (see earlier article on titanisovi ), but they were based on misinterpretation of the ball joint to karpometakarpu (Chandler 1994).

hands (or wings, if you want) the two-Recent ostrich (Struthio camelus , left) and svrchnojurského taxon lithographica Archaeopteryx (right). The nails are of course evident in both of them. (Modified from Abel 1911: Fig 4 and Fig 5)
claws on the hands of different influenza as Fisher (1940). (A) Pagophila - Gull (B) Cygnus - the Swan, (C) Rallus - crake, (D) Lophortyx - Křepela (E) Cathartes - Condor, (F) Archaeopteryx . (Source: scienceblogs.com / tetrapodzoology)

All this does not mean that hoacin no sign that it would (apparently) linked with Mesozoic birds and neptačími modern birds rather than dinosaurs - he has it, just nothing to do with nails. Hoacin Crested is the only bird that is hatched with nesrostlým karpometakarpem. Karpometakarpus - inaccurately called the metacarpus - consists only of the metacarpal bones were metakarpálů, as well as distal (distant body) carpal bones. Grow into one of these elements, although initially incomplete, the evolution of the bird appeared relatively soon - already at konfuciusornitidů. That is why it is almost impossible to represent the actual ontogeny hoacinova original state pleziomorfii. There is a total of doubt that the last common ancestor of all living birds (Neornithes ) hatched with fully Fused karpometakarpem and that hoacinův return to the "archaic" state is actually a highly derivative character, autapomorfií. After about 10 weeks after hatching hoacinovi metakarpály fused together into a single bone, as is the case with other birds already happening in the embryonic stage.
Unfortunately, this feature - and, of course, well-developed claws - caused that paleornitologických studies is hoacin with regularity, the only bird that appears next to or archeopteryga neptačích dinosaurs (Livezey & Zusi 2007). He began with the apparently Parker (1891), which even hoacina explicitly described as "reptilian bird" (Reptilian bird), but it still continued in Feduccia et al. (2005). This trend, unfortunately, encourages the belief - and if not intentionally, then this interpretation can not blame anyone - that is hoacin with the early birds and their "crawl" ancestors some exclusive relationship that him with any other shared living bird. Some ancient authors have suggested such a possibility quite openly: by Headleyho (1895) is hoacin "living fossils" from the time before the birds reached the "greater [his degree] organization." This is dead wrong - as well as explaining Dawkins (1982), the birds can not build a ladder, where taxa were standing below, closer relatives 'reptiles' Taxa than standing up. Evolution of the trees are not ladders. Kdybychom se od libovolného žijícího ptáka vydali po evoluční trajektorii zpátky, nutně bychom se dostali daleko dříve ke společnému ptačímu předkovi než k archeopterygovi nebo libovolnému "plazovi".
    Přesto nás takové představy strašily do nedávné minulosti: Livezey & Zusi (2007) upozornili na to, že iluzorní výjimečnost hoacinových drápů vedla několik autorů (Feduccia 1980; Olson 1985) k výrokům, že tento taxon pochází z "kořenů" Neornithes . (Podobné mlžení, from which not even the greatest effort could not squeeze a clear phylogenetic hypothesis, it is typical for these authors). Today, such views are (hopefully) do not occur, but still appear in every popular-educational article. Hoacin been described only in poetic terms, reportedly has "long ago" or "prehistoric". Really? Sure, the bird is not exactly a neighborhood, but if the reader that the article not met with a "unique" claw (which is actually any chicken) someone thought it would be difficult to use such an epithet. All the more pity that this nonsense occurs even when using high-quality resources (eg BirdLife International 2007), which is why it is necessary to refute.


* Well, yesterday I listened to a lecture where slajdovalo ruler and has been for us čelindžkou to something nemisnuli.

Sources:

Dealer Interview Questions

gardening work in May, fertilize

two days will arrive in May and with it a lot of garden work.
  • Since early May, you are ready for sowing cucumbers intended for transplanting. It is mostly grown in trays or wielodoniczkach.
  • In May sown maize . Thermophilic sweet corn should be sown until the end of the month.
  • There are already the first harvest of vegetables sown under cover or in plastic tunnels , min. onions, chives and radishes .
  • also collect seed yields of winter and vegetables, perennials, like asparagus, rhubarb and sorrel. We think
  • tomato seedlings , cucumbers, peppers and celery.
  • strong growth period in late May, pass tomatoes. Their stems are pretty weak, so each plant provided with strong stakes, to which we attach the plant gently. Tomatoes need lots of water to be pour into the groove around the plants.
  • in late May and June need more water strawberries. Spacing make watering without showering. Keep watering can spout as close to the ground, so that no water and no soil rozmywała brudziła fruit.
  • the space reserved for the discounts we have sown vegetable crops for green manure, such as rye, lupins, field peas and mustard. Quickly form a densely sown green carpet of weeds difficult. Then, they dig, which fertilize the soil and improve its structure.
  • It's time for seeding biennial plants .
  • In the first half of May we even sowing some summer annuals flowers.
  • In May we continue to exaggerate perennials and divide, we must remember that too much to trim the overgrown, above-ground parts of plants.
  • Perennials, which already has released the young shoots should be protected against chłodami night. If you announced a big drop in temperature-sensitive plants (eg Dahlias), we can protect material for mulching or even boxes or cartons.
  • Young shoots of climbing plants and szpalerowych should be given, as a loosely hanging shoots poorly tolerate strong winds. To avoid being crushed canes, we pay them so that they are not adhered too closely to the support.
  • early May is the period when you need to harden seedlings, flowers seedlings and sprouted bulbs and tubers, such as begonias bulbous. Destruction of the gardeners of the cold start (ie from 16 May). Meanwhile, in the habit of plants to external conditions, the weather is good to ventilate frames. Good growth determines the appropriate amount of light.
  • In May, ending a period of intensive plant growth onion. All the time loosens soil and remove weeds. In early May we make the last fertilization easily digestible wieloskładnkowymi fertilizers. These components will use the fertilizer plant to produce new corms and bulwek. In the faded flowers of plant breaks at the base. When the onion start to yellow leaves (means entering into a state of rest), cessation of watering.
  • on roses bushes may appear wild shoots growing out from the place of grafting. Noticed "dziczki" immediately break away from the earth at the same time odsypując root collar area.
  • At the end of the month starting to fade lilacs, faded flowers it is removed immediately, thanks to these plants also bloom in abundance in the next year.
If the lawn appears moss, soil, or a pitchfork to loosen the cylinder wrench.
can also benefit from special, regulated facilities, removing dead grass and moss.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Can I Still Be Preg With Dry Cm

From Conciliarism to the Enlightenment: An outline of Polish philosophy in a few examples ...



XIV century

James of Paradyż (ca. 1380-1464)

He was a student of Benedict Hesse . He wrote works of ascetic, dogmatic, canonical or moral. He was a strong supporter of Conciliarism . The eminent scholar of Scripture. He was also a supporter of the unity of the threatened collapse of European Christendom. " Upominały about the culture and religions of the Polish and German. He was a renewal of the Church, for the opposite of global life. He stressed role and working order. He criticized the so-called hypocrisy. "Swietoszkow.

fourteen-century Via Moderna, rejected the sum of the Holy. Thomas and Duns Scotus. Rapid and skeptical thought, pragmatism and interest in ethics. Wyrazicielką this was a school in Krakow. Opposite her was in turn Via Antiqua (the second half of the fifteenth century, the Jagiellonian University old scholasticism triumphed again), proclaiming that ethics is not geared to practice, but to get to know. The conduct consisted of an science as monastyka, economics, politics. In each individual need to consider the truth.

of Jaslo Bartholomew (c. 1360-1407)


Works: Ad celebrantes miss "," Tractatus de ignorantia "Glossa de" Nicomachean Ethics "; Glossa the "Sentences" Lombard. He wrote works of promotional lectures. He preached augustianizm XIV century with the release of Thomas of Strasbourg, Henry of Ghent, Giles Roman . Also quoted Thomas Aquinas. His views might be called "ethical intellectualism" because it insisted on morality. He initiated the renewal of the Jagiellonian University, supposedly to disperse the clouds of ignorance and stupidity. Peasants should be freed from the bondage of serfdom, nobility should be educated, the ruler should listen only to trained counselors, administrators - to his views. Learning should be accessible to all (not only for the privileged). Knowledge is a necessary condition for ethical life. Ethics uses monastyką (who learns to live honestly regard himself) and economy (because it forbids the other to do evil). Politics and teaches everyone to cast, what he deserves! Good people have to create a good system.


Luke Kozmin the Great (c. 1370 - 1412)


Work: "Gniezno Sermons" (1410) - they are considered second, after "preaching of the Holy Cross" , the oldest monument of Polish literature. Luke with WK for example, put the princes of Wladyslaw Jagiello. By wisdom. it should not only learn, but love.

John of Kluczbork (ca. 1370 - 1436)

Works, "the Letters of St. Principium. Paul"; "Principium the Book of Sentences and Lombard; Commentary "Analyst secondary" Aristotle Commentary on "Policies" of Aristotle. represented the views of moderate nominalism school buridanowskiej , as evidenced by his comments. He preached that man can not know the nature of God. The sentence "God exists" is self-evident, at least for the wise. The ruler should be good, just, love peace and defend the oppressed.

fifteenth century

philosophical tendencies in Poland: the naturalistic and rationalistic, attempts to separate orders of philosophy and theology. Antyspekulatywne attitude masters of Krakow, pragmatic approach to the objectives of science and knowledge. Played an important role too - pragmatism. He spoke in the valorization of the social sciences, the dominance ethics. In place of the degraded placed in metaphysics - physics. Appear The first threads of humanistic philosophy. Focusing on the issue of human rights.

Matthew of Krakow (ca. 1335-1410)

work: "Rationaleoperum divinorum sive quod Deus fecit omnia bene." One of the main representatives of the Via Moderna Poland. No time for theological problems of the Church. Christian is ever subjected to the power of the Church, but it is the carrier of this authority. Church therefore is a community of believers! He also said that the pope is not too clever or good will. It is fallacious, as any man. Is the head of the Church, but only figuratively. The church does not have two rulers in fact, only one - Christ. The Pope is therefore accountable to the Church, like each of us. Without it, would be nothing. There must be a community. Matthew was inspired by Plato, Aristotle, but ockhamowskim nominalism. He was so Polish Scholasticus and koncyliarystą.

John of folks (ca. 1400-1460)

Work: De laudibus et eloquentiae Dignitatem "(" Praise the pronunciation "). He was the Polish humanist. Alluded to by Cicero, Seneca, Aristotle and Plutarch. Praised the ideals of the humanities. He gave his time speech on behalf of the University, says in her on two foundations of the reform of the Church: 1) work should be preferred over inaction of contemplation, a general obligation to work (in fact arrest alleged clergy subduing the earth-treated .) Inactivity and idleness is the cause of theft, uncleanness. It is therefore necessary to change attitude of the clergy to the realities. 2) Family Life - called for the liquidation of celibacy, because the church undercuts the foundation "on which he should be encouraged." Nature has created a free, after all.


Jędrzej Knob of Dobczyna (ca. 1400-1451)


Works: "Treaty on the donation (donation), Constantine; "Song of Wiklefie." The first critic of the Church. Starts black thought and the history of that church. He believed that the king has the right to interfere in the affairs of the Church to receive the lands that were wrongfully removed. Interest of a sovereign state requires that the Church respect the right of the state. It is not good when you develop only one social stratum and dominated by or dominates the others. King may pick up these goods, which the Church has a surplus. It is - according Jędrzej - the role of the sovereign ruler of the kingdom!

Ostroróg John (c. 1436-1501)


Work: "Diary of a repair of the Republic." He wanted to strengthen the royal authority, and therefore it had to escape from papal authority (ecclesiastical). The monarch under any circumstances, should not anyone, especially the Pope, made an oath of obedience, because the king is the ruler of a sovereign Polish. Should cease submitting charges to Rome. This king is not right. That the clergy, with their estates, should pay taxes to the state treasury. Jan Ostroróg sharply criticized the selling of indulgences. Should to control the wealth of religious orders and their degree of Germanization. Demanded the introduction of a uniform law irrespective of social status. He co- so. moral philosophy.


sixteenth century


were formed when a number of commemorative speech, treaties, letters with a view to a wider audience, eg for students and visitors from Italy. Works initiated the discussion on the liberal arts. This contributed to the change strengthened the views and humanistic studies in Poland (Masters humanitas). Summer 50 ', 60' and 70 'is a sixteenth century opposition to scholastic thought. Then the debate was fought on the active and contemplative life. The most outstanding representatives of this era are: Nicholas Groasinus, Simon Marycjusz from Pilsen, Wojciech Nowopolczyk and John from Trzciana.


Simon Marycjusz of Pilsen (1516 - 1574)


Work: "The schools or academies of two books." He has cultivated the notion of utility and importance of education and school presented the measures which can be remedied by the collapse of the importance of schools in Poland. Especially appreciated the work with youth. Education is a treasure of the nation - he would say. Better educated people, smarter laws. He was for educating advisers rulers. He who has no education, it has no spiritual needs. Thinking about the knowledge you need to forget the partying. Please find the correct proportions for him and did not waste any time. The best regime is a monarchy, but the state is not owned by the ruler. He must govern with the natural law, because people can pronounce his obedience. Barriers to education include: laziness and indifference of the clergy of the nobility.


Wojciech Nowopolczyk (ca. 1504-1559)


his ideal of the contemplative life had nothing to do with monostacyzmem or rejection of the outside world.


with Trzciana John (1510 -1567)


Work: "On the Nature and the dignity of man." Introduced the concept of reality with the patristic tradition, but as one of the first, with emphasis on extraordinary position of man in the universe, as a firm in the whole of nature, the only rightful administrator of the world and the greatest work of God. In his writings he referred to Aristotle, St. Augustine, Saint. Ambrose. The dignity of human nature, which should be developed. He had a very optimistic approach. As well as his esteemed champions, did not reject the contemplative mind, rhetorical, but it also put on a pedestal in the educational process.


Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 - 1543)


Work: "On the Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres." In his view, the task of philosophy is to look in every area of \u200b\u200btruth based on reason, independent from the opinion of the public. Copernicus rejected the guiding principle of Aristotle, in explaining the dynamics of motion of earthly and heavenly bodies. He believed that body movement can exist without the constant physical contact with the cause of the movement. Also rejected the Aristotelian theory of ghosts poruszycieli, believed that the heavenly bodies received at the beginning of a world power, and therefore move permanent, continuous motion. Applied the principle of relativity of motion, testimony of the senses can be fooled. Although it rotates in a circle of natural philosophy, humanities and writing the language was very well-read in the classics. Some are associated with neoplatonikami Copernicus, but it is not proven. The biggest influence on the views of Copernicus had studied in Krakow. Attempted secularization of ethics. He was also of the opinion that the cause of the fall of countries is: discord, mortality, soil sterilization, spoiling the coin.


Stanislaw Orzechowski (1513 - 1566)


Work: " dialogue or conversation about execution proceeding Polish Crown." political opponent Modrzewskiego (about which I wrote HERE.) He was conservative, even sanctioned slavery. The man on his failures as a result formed a society on the state they are born. According to him, the ordering of the Republic does not need repair, because freedom is God's gift of nobility. You share into three parts: the office (power), clergy (sovereignty) and the quest for salvation through the Catholic society. The highest authority is to have a primate, the role of the king is to be limited only to the extermination of heretics. Justified the state of inequality, since the lower states should not act as state offices.

End of Part One

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Error Tally Migration Memory Violation

Qiliania Graffin taxes. nov. - Chinese protipták from the Lower Cretaceous theropods

Year 2011 have yet belonged sauropodům , but even the birds have not done badly. Many new discoveries recorded mainly Enantiornithes group that combined archaic dinosaur characters with many evolutionary innovations, associated mainly with active flight (aileron, socket shoulder joint shifted on the side of the blade). We have already seen extensive revision of the group in terms of cranial anatomy (O'Connor & Chiappe 2011) and brought a lot of information and redescription rapaxavise, one of the best preserved while nejbazálnějších enantiornitů (O'Connor et al. 2011). The two articles I briefly wrote a blog .

Now comes another protipták: Qiliania Graffin was described in a study led by Ji Shu'Anem, an author who participated in virtually every major discoveries related to Chinese feathered dinosaurs (Ji & Ji 1996, Ji et al. 1998). A new discovery this time not from any of the "profláklých" formation, although the total is also much ignorance. Spodnokřídové Xiagou Formation, which is speech, is located in northwestern China (Changma Basin, Gansu Province) from the APTU (from 125-112 million years) and the known avifauna is dominated by remnants of basal ornituromorfa Gansus yumenensis . Among the 100 fossil skeletons, which have not yet been found - and which, though usually incomplete, often stored and impressions of soft tissues - has been identified and located the remains enantiornitů. Ji et al. (2011) now recognize these protiptačích remains of a new taxon, known only from two incomplete, partially articulated skeletons - one forms a complete left foot with part of the pelvic girdle, and the second consists of almost the entire right leg. Both specimens bear characters diagnostic for example Enantiornithes , abstract study, however, does not state what autapomorfie (unique derived characters) support erecting a new taxon. Ji et al. (2011), however, promise a unique three-dimensional preservation of fossils - the vast majority of the Lower Cretaceous bird fossils are broken and no apparent depth - providing new insight into protiptačí anatomy, evolution and diversity.
Qilianii if I was not paying a separate article, I had on hand only the abstract, other But information provided on his blog Andrew Cao . As usual, covered the phylogeny and, as usual, sophisticated Cauova Megamatrice threw a different result than by the original authors. Ji et al. (2011) is qilianii vykryli in close relationship to European Iberomesornis while Megamatrice found inside her as a sister taxon gobipterygidů bohaiornise. Explanation? According to Caua it is not surprising: if protiptáci achieve at least a fraction of the diversity of modern birds had to be between homoplazie (convergent derived characters) greatly expanded. Consider, after all, how surprising homoplazie morphological analysis revealed controversial Houde'a and Fain (2004), or even a great crested grebes (Podicipediformes) and the red (Gaviiformes), which is the nature of the similarities homoplastická fully accepted.

A. Cao with his Megamatricí time shot into the water enantiornitů: Qiliania is second from bottom. (Source: theropoda.blogspot.com)

Sources: