Sunday, April 24, 2011

How Much For Rolladen

curious story of Walter Rothschild and casuar Sclaterova


Darren Naish to your blog tetrapod Zoology was basically a living legend. Although specialization paleozoology to tetrapod Zoology (or Tet Zoo, as it is familiarly called pages) of the paleontology neontologií mixed with incredible ease. Moreover, the Darrenův professional research over the past few years has changed the way we look at some Pan-extinct avian (a pterosaur azhdarchidní creeping across the floor in the style of today's marabou storks we owe him), is the author of the amazing skills of living quadrupeds. Them with their readers like to share in the long, rich details of the articles, which often clusters in the deep cycles - such as the one about Kyje, spikes, thorns and claws on the wings of birds or recently closed dvacetidílná ( !) series of netopýrovitých . Author but not limited to the living and extinct quadrupeds - writes with gusto about those whose existence scientists believe (kryptidech =) here and there and you come up with some (such as mentioned here flightless pterosaurs). Tet Zoo began on the same platform, where I write now and I, and is one of my biggest blog designs. In 2007 he moved to the prestigious ScienceBlogs network (where it still stands far above other blogs) and even has own book.

Courtesy of Darren Naish I now present the translation of one of my (and not just my ), long the most popular articles on Tet Zoo. Read you can access still on the old version tetrapod Zoology and again this February, under the name Walter Rothschild and the Rise and Fall of Sclater's cassowary "

(Source: en.wikipedia.org)

Lord Walter Rothschild (1868-1937) (picture from Wikipedia is drilled zebra [it says something about it - Ed. acknowledges the.]) was perhaps the most important and prolific collector of zoological specimens in the late 19th and early 20th century. While working from his home and at the same museum in Tring in Hertfordshire (today seat of the Rothschild museum and its collections of birds, now under the administration of the Natural History Museum) managed to amass an unrivaled collection of literally thousands of pieces of insects, bird and mammal skins, bird eggs and other material. Rothschild show seemed strange - if not a fanatic - Focus on a few specific groups of animals, including the bird of paradise (see Fuller, 1995), fleas, and cassowaries.
With no less than 62 stuffed specimens of the Rothschild collection forms one of the largest collections of cassowaries in the world. These exhibits are clearly shown to be tringské manager rather problematic: Whitehead & Keates (1981) wrote that "for some reason, Lord Rothschild chose to hell no less than 65 [sic] these large cassowaries, as if he intended to issue in the future. These pieces represent a unique collection and rather hard nut to crack for the curator. The collection was further enhanced by numerous skin and skeletal specimens! Rothschild claimed that the stuffing cassowaries pay special attention, and only one taxidermist - a man named Doggett - regarded as a capable satisfaction with the task. The padding of a Rothschild Doggett casuar paid 30 pounds, the sum which Rothschild curators and relatives considered to be extremely high. Consequently, the brother of Charles Walter Rothschild, the agreement in 1908 shortened. More than 60 stuffed animals eventually cost over £ 2,000.
Rothschild studied these specimens in order to write a memoir, which described all the different varieties. He considered it necessary to base their stories on living individuals and not just at the skins, so collected all living cassowaries, which could behave and observe. Few have been published about how the Rothschild and his perzonál care about birds, it is nevertheless known that it is not kept in a greenhouse or any other heated environment. One wrote that "[t] hen England survived six winters without heat (M. Rothschild, 1983:103 - book cover shown here Miriam Rothschild [seeing other zebras trained], it is essential reading for anyone who cares or Rothschild his collection).
(Source: scienceblogs.com / tetrapodzoology)

Given that cassowaries are known for their combativeness , you might ask, if not cause any difficulties. [Note acknowledges the. Darren your article from 2006 neupdateoval, otherwise it could be mentioned as a curiosity, what risk cassowaries recently presented to the Queensland people afflicted by the floods. Even if you strip away some sensationalism, cassowaries with ostrich dvouprstým remain the only birds proven to kill the person (Naish 1999).] really been partial reason why Nathaniel Rothschild's father approached his son's collection so hard. In 1888 one of cassowaries freely wandering Tring Park attack on Nathaniel's horse. Rothschild, however, his work actually completed and in 1900 published a definitive monograph cassowaries (W. Rothschild, 1900). In this more than handsomely illustrated work has identified several new "species" and "sub" on the basis of color or shape neck lobes - characters which today are considered too volatile for it to form a reliable basis for taxonomy.
Although it might seem that his research cassowaries now reached fulfillment, Rothschild and continued collecting birds began to gather secret collection of live specimens. Although his father forbade the purchase of other individuals, Rothschild wrote his collectors to send a live cassowaries continued, instead of sending them straight to the Tring, however, is should keep in a safe place.
Rothschild, however, a dark secret: blackmailed by his former lover, a wealthy aristocrat. With the support of her husband, this time a woman - in 1931 - forced Rothschild to sell the better part of his ornithological collection of American Museum of Natural History (American Museum of Natural History) for $ 225,000 - probably around USD per copy [!]. Vyděračka remained anonymous, but Miriam Rothschild (1983) stated that it is aware of her true identity. Despite This huge and devastating loss of the Rothschild could not tear himself away from his cassowaries and all specimens - stuffed, skin and skeleton - are left in Tring. Here today, an invaluable collection of fascinating history.

(former) mystery casuar Sclaterova

cassowaries Sclaterův - Casuarius philip - the name to Rothschild in 1898, gave individuals in captivity, held by the London Zoological Gardens. I was transported from Kolkata and was named in honor of Philip L. Sclater (who is remembered in the name of a "subspecies" casuar přilbového, Casuarius casuarius Sclater *). Was apparently captured in New Guinea and deserves mention for the remarkable morphology of him Rothschild described. In his opinion, even Sclaterův cassowaries cassowaries most diverse of all.
When this "species" in 1898 described Rothschild thought that, despite the brown feathers were fully grown individuals, who thus its color all other kasuárům defied. Although feathers turned black over the years as well as everyone else casuar, more features, but remained highly unusual. Not only is the structure of its feathers more like emus than cassowaries, but the thighs and tail dorůstalo such length that the bird was pulling him along the ground.
casuar Sclaterova helmet has been described as a transition from the condition known casuar jednolaločného ( unappendiculatus C) and from casuar Bennett ( C. Bennett) - flattened in front, but back like mound or mounds. [Drawing casuar jednolaločného from D. Naish under this paragraph, I replaced the pictures of the same taxon - acknowledges the note.] His call was supposedly "reminded of the deep roar" and not like the other kasuárům. The bottom of the neck were "cherry-crimson 'and facial lobes (Rothschild referred to them as" front pocket, although I'm not sure whether this is indeed an appropriate term) in the inflated state tinged in lavender blue. Only cervical flap was round, flattened Blue in the bottom and red cherry on top (W. Rothschild, 1900).

jednolaločný cassowaries, Casuarius unappendiculatus . (Source: wikimedia.org)

notable, however, were the strong and short legs: even though it was a big bird (Rothschild described it as "giant"), his body was closer to earth than at any casuar another great - height is small compared to cassowaries Bennett. Rothschild even compared to casuar Sclaterova pachyornisovi, tlustonohému moa bird, which became famous for its size in combination with a squat, short body composition. That explains the picture that I used at the top: cassowaries Sclaterův the left (from W. Rothschild [1900]), then the right is a drawing pachyornise, which was added childish cassowaries helmet. [Figure I reprinted the following paragraph - ed. acknowledges the.] While fascinating, this animal appears to now be considered an individual C. unappendiculatus , although some authors at least consider it as representative of the different 'subspecies' (Howard & Moore 1991). Despite Rothschild certainty about the specific nature casuar Sclaterova were his bizarre and unusual proportions down allegedly due to individual variations or way of life, which led the bird in captivity. Anyway, it sounds like it was a special bird.
Rothschild biggest mistake in his work on cassowaries were apparently willing to recognize a new "kind" whenever encountered casuar particularly strong color pattern on head and neck. The tendency to distinguish different "types" based on subtle differences even commented during his brother's life, and Rothschild and the staff (M. Rothschild, 1983) and his criticism should not therefore be regarded as a unique issue for today's enlightened era.

cassowaries Sclaterův pictured left, including the blue "cheek pockets, flaps and unique two-color helmet, the right" pokasuářený "Moa Pachyornis . (Source: scienceblogs.com / tetrapodzoology)

* C. casuarius Sclater in 1878 was named as the new "kind". Rothschild (1900) referred to it as casuar D'Albertisova. [Note acknowledges the.: photo type individuals - are now also exposed the way in Tring - I missed the article. Salvador (1878) described it under the name Casuarius Sclater ; to C. casuarius him as a "subspecies" moved himself Rothschild (1900). He also noted that it is the largest representative of the entire group of cassowaries drying. Confusing is that even this "subspecies" have sometimes usurped the name "cassowaries Sclaterův" (Eg here), which comes along with D. Naish for use "once-kind" C. philip .]

Sources:
  • Fuller E 1995 The Lost Bird of Paradise . Shrewsbury, UK: Swan Hill Press
  • Howard R, Moore and 1991 Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, 2nd Edition . London: Christopher Helm
  • Rothschild M 1983 Dear Lord Rothschild: Birds, Butterflies and History . Glenside, PA: Balaban Publishers
  • Rothschild W 1900 Monograph of the Genus Casuarius . Transact ZOOL Soc Lond 15: 109-48
  • Whitehead, PJP, Keates C 1981 by The British Museum (Natural History) . London: P. Wilson
  • [Sources cited by the translator:
are some interesting comments to the original article , and both the old , and the new version of the Tet Zoo. The current expert scheme cassowaries Richard Perron - whose Web site I cited above - such a sharp tone to repeat what is already in the article written by D. Naish said, but an interesting fact, namely that Rothschild approach to taxonomy was at that time, his "splitterstvím "unexceptional. He said also that the shape of the helmet may be associated with an elevation of living space, which could explain one of the "unique" features C. philip . The debate resurfaced also Victorian Style Collectibles - $ 225,000 at a cost of $ 1 per copy is really specimens, as shown in the discussion, the extinction of many animals sufficed much smaller collections.

Perhaps the best commentary, but came to the old version of the blog Mike Taylor. This secondary storyline with extortion only distract from the main plot - hoping to extort a secret Rothschild cassowaries fetishist whose only condition was cassowaries More! Taylor apparently felt that všepohlcující passion for cassowaries in those days, spreading faster than a zombie virus in Resident Evil , and that was just so contagious.

0 comments:

Post a Comment